8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should
CSS has brought us many capabilities in terms of typography and the web, but we always seem to be limited to the same 4-5 typefaces over and over again. There is an inherant problem, if the font you specify isn’t on the viewers computer it won’t render in that font. So as designers and developers we end up selecting the ones that we can safely assume is available on most computers today. So most pages use Arial, Helvetica, or Georgia as their typefaces… and the world of the web remains slightly more bland.
But there are quite a few high quality typefaces that are available on most new computer systems and you can always fall back on the common ones. Of course there are options like creating images, dynamic headlines, and siFR… but all of these techniques increase load time and development time. There are plenty of good reasons to be strategic in the font choices rather than using additional technology. I am shocked at how rarely I see anyone taking advantage of these type options, so here is a quick and dirty list of fonts you should and could use in your desgns and stylesheets.
1. Palatino Linotype / Palatino
WINDOWS 97.09% / MAC 78.86%
This is a nice serif font that his pretty good support for both Mac and Windows based machines (97.09% of all windows machines have it, and 78.86% of mac’s). Yet very few people use it and instead default to georgia or times. As you can see it makes for great headlines, and I have used it with success as copy type as well. Worse case you can always default back to georgia, times, etc.
2. Tahoma
WINDOWS 96.09% / MAC 72.02%
I admit this is not one of my favorite fonts, but it does have many instances where it could be used effectively. It doesn’t seem to get used very often despite the fact that it could be an excellent copy font. Again there is always Arial or Helvetica if the machine doesn’t have Tahoma installed.
3. Impact
WINDOWS 95.85% / MAC 88.08%
Admittedly this font probably is overused in non-web related design. Since it is one of the “cooler” default fonts on most machines it tends to get a lot of use. Despite this fact there are plenty of good places to use it, and it works great for well… “impactfull” headlines.
4. Century Gothic
WINDOWS 85.44% / MAC 42.50%
This is a nice elegant font that was overused by graphic designers some time ago, but it has been locked away and shunned for some time now. It may almost be time to pull it back out of the tool chest. Not a huge percent of Mac systems come with it preinstalled, but most new ones do. Depending on your target audience this could be the perfect font to use. If you are worried about the low mac support you could always opt for Futura as well (which has very high mac support).
5. Arial Black
WINDOWS 97.73% / MAC 96.18%
Yup you don’t just have to use plain old Arial. Arial black is a nice bold font that could be perfect for headings, impacting headlines, and hell even a replacement for the Impact font mentioned above. I don’t know that I would use it for body text, but it is an option that should be realized in web typography.
6. Arial Narrow
WINDOWS 87.08% / MAC 91.01%
Arial again! We are not done yet, oh no. Much like arial black, arial narrow is a great font for headlines. Instead of the big bold in your face style of headlines you can use this typeface for more elegant subtle headlines. A nice change from the traditional arial, and can be used much like you would a condensed font.
7. Copperplate / Copperplate Gothic Light
WINDOWS 58.13% / MAC 85.85%
I will admit I hate this font, mostly because it is misused (and people will probably argue that it is not the fonts fault, but the designers). But there are times when it can be used effectively, and it has pretty good support on newer windows computers and most mac based computers. Most likely it will again be for headlines, larger headlines, as it is not terribly legible at small fonts especially when it isn’t properly aliased.
8. Gill Sans / Gill Sans MT
WINDOWS 43.09% / MAC 90.82%
No surprise I like this font. I think it works both in copy and in headlines, and it has fair support in both platforms. Anytime you use a font that has about 50% support rate you want to think about the next logical font to serve, but there are enough options specific to windows that would let you achieve the same typographic message with only subtle differences.
- Author: Ross Johnson
- Date: Thursday, May 8, 2008
- Comments: 177 Comments
- Categories:
About This BLOG
Since inception, this blog has covered a plethora of topics. Excited by all things design, I spent six years with out a focus. A year ago I discovered my true passion... designing with psychology (primarily as it related to the web). Many thanks to my Web Design Agency, 3.7 DESIGNS that gifts me time to publish my findings.
The Latest Buzz
You should follow us on twitter here.




[...] » 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should – Web Design Marketing Podcast &… [...]
[...] Visit Article [...]
[...] » 8 fonts you probably don?t use in css, but should – Web Design Marketing Podcast & BlogI'm not sure about a couple of these, but the point is valid nonetheless [...]
[...] should also point to 8 fonts you probably don’t use in CSS, but should as the inspiration to change my sidebar headers to Gill Sans (though I might pick a different sans [...]
[...] » 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should – Web Design Marketing Podcast & Blog More hints about cross-platform font goodness. (tags: web typography fonts) [...]
[...] 8 CSS Fonts You Probably dont use but should [...]
[...] artÃculo en donde muestran ”8 fuentes que probablemente nunca usaste en tus diseños en CSS pero que [...]
Excellent tests with ratios and all. That help to know the percentage.
[...] 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should – This guy (can’t find his name..) from 3.7 designs has written a very interesting post. I [...]
i only have arial black, tahoma and impact here on my Linux/Fedora machine…
will check my mac later on that!
thanks anyways… as you said: we can still default to another one
Awesome article, thanks for the percentages so it is easier to tell who you are designing for when using certain fonts. You’re right, I dont use most of these and after reading this article, I am going to start using these fonts more often in my design.
great article there! Found it just in time to solve the “boring typeface problem” I’ve been encountering for e-newsletters…Cheers!
I love Gill Sans (and not just because its designer Eric Gill used to live in my old home town of High Wycombe).
It’s a good-looking typeface, legible at most sizes, and it mixes well with other fonts. It’s in Mac and Office. The railways use it extensively on their signage. It ends up on a lot of my own websites and it’s my default font in Word.
Unfortunately it’s useless for text that mixes a lot of numbers and letters. The letters I and l and the number 1 look identical in Gill Sans, as I realised the first time I used it on a spreadsheet!
I agree Jason, I love Gill Sans… it is a beautiful font that hasn’t found its way on many peoples radar, especially for web. Thanks for the great feedback!
This is the first place on the internet I have ever come across where someone have publicly stated they like Comic Sans… a LOT.
@Gustav – As much as I hate to admit it, I have read case studies that have showed increases in conversion rate by using comic sans on HTML e-mails because it is more casual in nature. As a type snob it makes me cry, as a marketer it makes me think…
I hear you Ross and I see your point.. Still, it hurts a little inside. I get shivers everytime I see that font put to use
I think the ‘Ban Comic Sans’ site says it best; “These widespread abuses of [Comic Sans] threaten to erode the very foundations upon which centuries of typographic history are built.” Didn’t mean to spark a discussion about Comic Sans here, I was just surprised to read someone actually stating they love the font. As long as it’s HTML e-mails we’re talking about tho, I can probably live with that as I’ve yet to recieve one (or maybe I have, but simply repressed it from my memory
)
I discovered Palatino Linotype when I was in middle school or early high school. It has since been my default font for just about everything.
There’s a JavaScript error on this page. It crashed my InternetExplorer.
The error said” ‘console’ is undefined.
I use Trebuchet a lot for headings, Verdana looks really clunky in big sizes. Trebuchet doesn’t work very well for body text though, Verdana still rules there, imho.
And apparently, acoording to http://www.apaddedcell.com/web-fonts, Trebuchet is pretty common across platforms. Yay!
[...] 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should – Web Design Marketing Podcast & Blog Feel like you’re being too constrained by limiting yourself to Times/Georgia and Arial/Helvetica? Check out this list of well-supported web fonts. [...]
[...] » 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should – Web Design Marketing Podcast I would add to this list: Constantia (new in Vista, Mac Office 2008), and remove: Impact, Copperplate. (tags: css typography webdev reference) [...]
[...] http://www.3point7designs.com/blog/2008/05/08/8-fonts-you-probably-dont-use-in-css-but-should/ « Oplever du MicroBoredom? Oppe i luften – nede pÃ¥ jorden » [...]
nice post.
I liked the content on this site. Would like to visit again.
Excellent post! I alreadu used century gothic a few times, now I shall try more
[...] related design. ….. This should be called ???9 fonts you are probably already using in CSS??? …http://www.3point7designs.com/blog/2008/05/08/8-fonts-you-probably-dont-use-in-css-but-should/French students’ murderer has probably killed before Daily TelegraphThe murderer of the two French [...]
Articles like this kind of snap you out of a rut. I get in the habit of just specifying an Arial or Verdana and it is boring. Love your site design, here and the business site too!
[...] » 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should – Web Design Marketing Podcast & Blog – Annotatedtags: typography, css, fonts [...]
[...] CSS has brought us many capabilities in terms of typography and the web, but we always seem to be limited to the same 4-5 typefaces over and over again. There is an inherant problem, if the font you specify isn’t on the viewers computer it won’t render in that font. (full story) [...]
It was a amazing experience to visit this website and read the articles and contents. From: http://www.saadepunjab.com
[...] 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should. A la hora de trabajar con fuentes siempre acabamos utilizando las mismas 4 o 5 fuentes: Arial, Verdana, Georgia,… En este post nos ofrecen 8 alternativas que nos pueden ayudar a enriquecer tipográficamente nuestros diseños, y que están presentes en gran medida en los usuarios tanto de Windows como de Mac. Fuentes como: Palatino, Tahoma, Impact, Century Gothic o Copperplate. El inconveniente del artÃculo es que no contempla los usuarios de Linux. Para tener una visión más global de las fuentes instaladas con los sistemas operativos podemos recurrir a Complete Guide to Pre-Installed Fonts in Linux, Mac, and Windows. [...]
[...] or Georgia as their typefaces?? and the world of the web remains slightly more bland.But …http://www.3point7designs.com/blog/2008/05/08/8-fonts-you-probably-dont-use-in-css-but-should/Survey: How Long Do You Meditate For? import url http://app.sgizmo.com/css/survey_base.css?4456458 [...]
thanks,
very helpful
[...] 8 fuentes para CSS poco utilizadas Sitios con archivos .PSD originales para descargar GuÃa SEO para diseñadores [...]
[...] 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should » – Web Design Marketing Podcast & Blog (tags: article blogs blog browser coding compatibility computer cool) [...]
This is a nice posting. I really like this post.
[...] aussehen sollten. Nicht 100% Browser Safe aber dennoch auf den meisten Systemem installiert sind diese 8 Fonts, die im Web wirklich ganz nett aussehen aber bisher noch relativ selten verwendet werden. var [...]
[...] Fonte on vähe! Tavalises veebis kasutatavaid fonte on antud näpu otsaga ja nad kipuvad operatsioonisüsteemiti erinema. Mõistagi võib CSSiga trikitada või pealkirjad pildiks või flashisks teha, aga see on ajamahukas ja suurema teksimahu korral ebamugav. Disaineril kujunevad samuti välja omad lemmikud ning nii näemegi Times-Georgia-Trebuchet-käekirja või Arial-Verdana-Tahoma-lemmikuid. Samas on me kasutuses olevad pillid paraja hulga eelinstalleeritud kirjatüüpidega. Tõsi, need küll erinevad macil ja linuxil, aga samas hea teada, mis pilliga kaasa antud. Teine võimalus on endal kunstlikult fondihorisont laiali hoida ja vägisi meenutada, mis kirjatüübid jäänud katalooginurka igavlema. [...]
[...] 8 fonts you probably don’t use in css, but should » – Web Design Marketing Podcast & Blog. [...]
thanks this is really usefull
[...] 3.7 design han sacado una lista con las funentes mas usadas en los ordenadores, a continuación las mostramos [...]
[...] 8 Fonts You Probably Don’t Use in CSS, but Should [...]
The visit was useful. Content was really very informative.
CSS “Cascading Style Sheets” Lessons
css list style Properties and examples — http://css-lessons.ucoz.com/list-css-examples.htm
Thanks, for this information and news it was very useful to me
Congrulations for this nice web design..Usefull..
[...] le site 3.7 Designs a listé 8 polices jamais utilisées mais qui pourrait l’être. Voici la liste résumée : 1. Palatino, WINDOWS 97.09% / MAC [...]
Where’s Papyrus? Everyone should use Papyrus!
Thanks for sharing.